Differentiating between Iconic Mindbombs and Incongruous Mindbombs Using Pentadic Ratios in the Defacing of Priceless Art in Environmental Activism

Abstract

This essay applies environmental activist Robert Hunter’s conception of mindbombs to recent environmental activists throwing tomato soup, throwing mashed potatoes, and smearing paint on Van Gogh’s, Monet’s, and Degas’s works of art. Hunter’s mindbombs align with Hariman’s and Lucaites’s (2003; 2007; 2016; 2018) iconic photography while the defacing of priceless works of art adhere to Burke’s (1954) grotesque perspective by incongruity. In turn, iconic mindbombs relied on Burke’s (1969a) scene-purpose pentadic ratio, while incongruous mindbombs rely on Burke’s scene-act pentadic ratio. 

Keywords

Mindbomb, Pentad, Pentadic Ratios, Iconic Photography, Robert Hunter, Burke, Hariman and Lucaites

How to Cite

Kice, B., (2024) “Differentiating between Iconic Mindbombs and Incongruous Mindbombs Using Pentadic Ratios in the Defacing of Priceless Art in Environmental Activism”, POROI 18(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.17077/2151-2957.33758

287

Views

57

Downloads

Share

Authors

Brent Kice (University of Houston-Clear Lake)

Download

Issue

Dates

Licence

CC BY-NC 4.0

Identifiers

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • Differentiating between Iconic Mindbombs and Incongruous Mindbombs: 4bae351f1062e064277896c3adb60eab