Article
Authors: James Wynn (Carnegie Mellon University) , Lynda Walsh (University of Nevada, Reno)
This essay discusses the major themes that emerged as part of an Octavian roundtable discussion on the topics of science, publics and controversy at the Association of Rhetoric of Science and Technologies’ (ARST) 2012 Vicentennial preconference. Participants expressed interest in developing research exploring the differing scales and types of scientific controversies and the roles that rhetoricians might play as interveners in public disagreements on techno-scientific issues. Participants also explored the emerging phenomenon—such as the role of the internet in facilitating interaction between lay publics, science, and scientists—that they believed would provide fertile sites of investigation for scholars in rhetoric and communication interested in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine.
Keywords: rhetoric of science, STeM, public controversy and science, ARST Vicentennial
How to Cite: Wynn, J. & Walsh, L. (2013) “Emerging Directions in Science, Publics, and Controversy”, Poroi. 9(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.13008/2151-2957.1156